"jkm7680" (jkm7680)
03/30/2015 at 11:30 • Filed to: None | 4 | 11 |
I'm trying to configure me a damn Camaro and I'm totally getting cockblocked by Chevrolet. I can open the configurator, but I can't actually select any trims or options. I'll probably just blame Obama for these misfortunes and carry on with my life. But I'm just wondering if it's a me thing or an everyone thing.
Using Chrome, Firefox and Internet Exploder. None of them really seem to be working. Windows 8.A bunch of numbers if you are wondering. On my desktop running Windows 7 it seems to work fine though.
Jayhawk Jake
> jkm7680
03/30/2015 at 11:38 | 0 |
2016 CAMARO EARLY REVEAL CONFIRMED
jkm7680
> Jayhawk Jake
03/30/2015 at 11:41 | 0 |
I swear to fuck if it's ugly.
It's supposed to be a lot lighter than the current one, so there's that. If only Dodge would learn from that, since the Challenger weights just about as much as a cruise ship.
For Sweden
> jkm7680
03/30/2015 at 11:45 | 0 |
It's a muscle car; what were you expecting?
spanfucker retire bitch
> jkm7680
03/30/2015 at 11:47 | 0 |
GM has always consistently had one of the worst fucking configurators on the planet. I've always thought Ford had the least interactive, and least impressive, but at least it works. All of GM's configurators, across their entire lineup of brands has only ever really worked well for me in IE11. In Chrome it eventually stops working, and in my daily browser - Firefox - it never works. Not even once.
Jayhawk Jake
> jkm7680
03/30/2015 at 11:48 | 1 |
I like the current one, so Ill probably like the new one
jkm7680
> For Sweden
03/30/2015 at 11:48 | 0 |
I was expecting rocket jets, a heated pool, a 10000 inch plasma television and a workforce of 45 servants to carry out every other function of the vehicle rather than motors.
Trunk Impaired 318
> jkm7680
03/30/2015 at 11:48 | 2 |
Yes, but its a personal choice.
jkm7680
> spanfucker retire bitch
03/30/2015 at 11:49 | 0 |
Huh, I've actually always liked the experience since you actually can see pretty much everything. Dodge is a different story, they haven't made much of an effort to fix that.
jkm7680
> Jayhawk Jake
03/30/2015 at 11:49 | 0 |
Same.
spanfucker retire bitch
> jkm7680
03/30/2015 at 12:00 | 0 |
Oh man, yeah, I forgot about Dodge's experience. It's pretty shit. I just don't like Ford's because it doesn't give you a good view of the interior. Even GM's system - which barely works - still affords you multiple view of the interior, with Cadillac's configurator even giving you a full 360. Ford's is a zoomed out ISO view.
jkm7680
> spanfucker retire bitch
03/30/2015 at 15:04 | 0 |
But Ford does give a view of the interior!
The GM system is fine for me IMO. It normally works pretty good and the views are fine. Cadillac, I don't mess with too much. Last time I checked, the views were way too small and a lot of stuff wasn't actually shown.
I'd normally complain about the lack of a Volkswagen car configurator, but they have since brought that feature back, so I'm not complaining about that.